Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Carl Dixon D/B/A Dixon Contracting v. Doug Groves and Patty Groves
Citation: Not availableDocket: 03-07-00138-CV
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; April 18, 2007; Texas; State Appellate Court
Original Court Document: View Document
A joint motion was filed by Carl Dixon, doing business as Dixon Contracting, and Doug and Patty Groves to vacate the trial court's judgment and dismiss the case with prejudice, as per their Rule 11 settlement agreement. The Texas Court of Appeals, Third District, at Austin, acknowledged its authority to render a judgment in line with the parties' agreement and granted the motion. Consequently, the court vacated the judgment issued by the County Court at Law No. 4 of Williamson County and dismissed the case with prejudice, prohibiting any future refiling. The order was issued on April 18, 2007, by Chief Justice W. Kenneth Law, with Justices Puryear and Henson concurring.