You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

FIA Card Services, N.A. F/K/A MBNA America Bank, N.A. v. Catherine v. Alloggio

Citation: Not availableDocket: 03-07-00222-CV

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; April 23, 2007; Texas; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

FIA Card Services, N.A. (formerly MBNA, America Bank, N.A.) filed an emergency motion for stay and expedited review on April 23, 2007, regarding a restricted appeal from a judgment issued by the Hays County Court at Law on December 11, 2006. The appellee, Catherine V. Alloggio, had served post-judgment discovery on MBNA, due by April 24, 2007. MBNA contended it first became aware of the judgment upon receiving the discovery request on March 22, 2007, and is preparing a supersedeas bond to suspend enforcement of the judgment as permitted by Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 24. The Court granted MBNA a temporary stay on its obligation to respond to the post-judgment discovery, effective until ten days from the date of the order. The ruling was issued on April 23, 2007, with Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Waldrop presiding.

Legal Issues Addressed

Emergency Motion for Stay and Expedited Review

Application: The court granted FIA Card Services a temporary stay on its obligation to respond to post-judgment discovery, allowing time to prepare a supersedeas bond.

Reasoning: The Court granted MBNA a temporary stay on its obligation to respond to the post-judgment discovery, effective until ten days from the date of the order.

Restricted Appeal Process

Application: FIA Card Services initiated a restricted appeal due to alleged lack of awareness of the judgment until receiving a post-judgment discovery request.

Reasoning: FIA Card Services, N.A. (formerly MBNA, America Bank, N.A.) filed an emergency motion for stay and expedited review on April 23, 2007, regarding a restricted appeal from a judgment issued by the Hays County Court at Law on December 11, 2006.

Supersedeas Bond under Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 24

Application: MBNA is utilizing the provision under Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 24 to suspend enforcement of the judgment by preparing a supersedeas bond.

Reasoning: MBNA contended it first became aware of the judgment upon receiving the discovery request on March 22, 2007, and is preparing a supersedeas bond to suspend enforcement of the judgment as permitted by Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 24.