Narrative Opinion Summary
The Texas Court of Appeals, Third District, at Austin, has granted the motion to dismiss the appeal filed by Marshall Scott Mills (also known as David Scott Mills and David Lynn Bollinger) against the State of Texas. The dismissal is in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a). The case originated from the 22nd Judicial District Court in Hays County, overseen by Judge Charles R. Ramsay. The decision was made by Justices Jones, Kidd, and Yeakel, and the dismissal was officially filed on September 14, 2000. The ruling is not intended for publication.
Legal Issues Addressed
Dismissal of Appeal under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a)subscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The Texas Court of Appeals applied Rule 42.2(a) to grant the motion to dismiss the appeal filed by the appellant against the State of Texas.
Reasoning: The Texas Court of Appeals, Third District, at Austin, has granted the motion to dismiss the appeal filed by Marshall Scott Mills (also known as David Scott Mills and David Lynn Bollinger) against the State of Texas. The dismissal is in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a).
Jurisdiction of the Texas Court of Appealssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The Third District Court of Appeals in Austin exercised its jurisdiction to review the motion to dismiss the appeal originating from the 22nd Judicial District Court in Hays County.
Reasoning: The case originated from the 22nd Judicial District Court in Hays County, overseen by Judge Charles R. Ramsay.
Non-Publication of Judicial Decisionssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court's decision to dismiss the appeal is noted as not intended for publication, indicating it is not to be used as precedent.
Reasoning: The ruling is not intended for publication.