Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Hamilton Ehimika v. Colonial Grand at Bear Creek
Citation: Not availableDocket: 02-07-00368-CV
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; March 20, 2008; Texas; State Appellate Court
The Court of Appeals for the Second District of Texas addressed the appeal of Hamilton Ehimiwa against Colonial Grand at Bear Creek. The appellant was notified on January 30 and February 27, 2008, that arrangements for payment of the clerk's record had not been made, as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2). The court warned that failure to make payment arrangements would result in dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution. As the appellant did not comply with this requirement, the court decided to dismiss the appeal based on Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 37.3(b) and 42.3(b). The appellant is ordered to pay all costs associated with the appeal, with execution to issue for collection. The judgment was delivered by a panel consisting of Justices Livingston, Dauphinot, and Holman on March 20, 2008.