Narrative Opinion Summary
The Court of Appeals of the Second District of Texas has granted Gerald W. Haddock's unopposed motion to dismiss his appeal against Crescent Real Estate Equities and its related entities. The dismissal is pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, specifically Rule 42.1(a)(1) and Rule 43.2(f). The court ordered that the costs of the appeal be taxed against the party who incurred them. The decision was delivered on April 6, 2006, by a panel consisting of Justices Walker, Cayce, and McCoy.
Legal Issues Addressed
Dismissal of Appeal under Texas Rules of Appellate Proceduresubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal based on an unopposed motion filed by the appellant, as permitted under specific appellate rules.
Reasoning: The Court of Appeals of the Second District of Texas has granted Gerald W. Haddock's unopposed motion to dismiss his appeal against Crescent Real Estate Equities and its related entities.
Taxation of Costs in Appellate Proceedingssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court ordered that the costs of the appeal be borne by the party who incurred them, following the standard practice in appellate procedures.
Reasoning: The court ordered that the costs of the appeal be taxed against the party who incurred them.