Narrative Opinion Summary
Relators Karen L. Wieland and Duane E. Wieland filed a petition for a writ of mandamus in the Court of Appeals for the Second District of Texas, seeking relief against respondent Judith G. Wells. After reviewing the petition, the response from Wells, and the reply from the relators, the court concluded that the petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. The relators are ordered to pay all costs associated with this original proceeding, with execution for costs to be issued. The memorandum opinion was delivered per curiam by the panel consisting of Justices McCoy, Livingston, and Dauphinot on April 19, 2004.
Legal Issues Addressed
Costs Associated with Original Proceedingssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The relators were ordered to bear all costs related to the original mandamus proceeding, illustrating the financial responsibility of the petitioners in this case.
Reasoning: The relators are ordered to pay all costs associated with this original proceeding, with execution for costs to be issued.
Denial of Petition for Writ of Mandamussubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court denied the petition for a writ of mandamus filed by the relators, indicating that the relief sought was not warranted.
Reasoning: After reviewing the petition, the response from Wells, and the reply from the relators, the court concluded that the petition for writ of mandamus should be denied.