Narrative Opinion Summary
The Michigan Supreme Court denied an application for leave to appeal the April 16, 2013 judgment of the Court of Appeals concerning the case involving the parties Frasco, Caponigro, Wineman, and IGC Management, Inc. The Court concluded that the questions presented did not warrant review. The ruling was formalized by Chief Justice Robert P. Young, Jr., and the order was certified by Clerk Larry S. Royster, confirming the authenticity of the document.
Legal Issues Addressed
Certification of Court Orderssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The order denying the application was formally recognized and certified, ensuring its official status.
Reasoning: The ruling was formalized by Chief Justice Robert P. Young, Jr., and the order was certified by Clerk Larry S. Royster, confirming the authenticity of the document.
Criteria for Supreme Court Reviewsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The Court determined that the issues raised in the application did not justify the need for further examination by the Supreme Court.
Reasoning: The Court concluded that the questions presented did not warrant review.
Denial of Leave to Appealsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The Michigan Supreme Court chose not to review the case, indicating that the questions presented did not meet the criteria for a Supreme Court review.
Reasoning: The Michigan Supreme Court denied an application for leave to appeal the April 16, 2013 judgment of the Court of Appeals concerning the case involving the parties Frasco, Caponigro, Wineman, and IGC Management, Inc.