Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
State ex rel. Warren v. Friedland
Citation: 2013 Ohio 2102Docket: 99541
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals; May 22, 2013; Ohio; State Appellate Court
Original Court Document: View Document
Jerome Warren filed a mandamus action against Judge Carolyn B. Friedland on February 15, 2013, seeking to compel a ruling on his motions for 85 days of jail-time credit, initially submitted on December 6, 2012, in cases CR-560296 and CR-560298. The respondent, Judge Friedland, responded on March 5, 2013, with a motion for summary judgment based on mootness, providing certified journal entries from March 4, 2013, which granted Warren 84 days of jail-time credit. This credit effectively resolved Warren's request, as it appears he had completed his sentence, with his release date adjusted to March 13, 2013, and he was placed under the supervision of the Adult Parole Authority. Consequently, the court granted the respondent's summary judgment motion and denied Warren's writ of mandamus, ordering each party to bear their own costs. The judgment was to be recorded and served per Civil Rule 58(B).