Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Conley v. Faurecia Exhaust Sys., Inc.
Citation: 2010 Ohio 5272Docket: 2010-1192
Court: Ohio Supreme Court; November 2, 2010; Ohio; State Supreme Court
Original Court Document: View Document
Discretionary appeal was accepted concerning Proposition of Law No. I in the case of Conley v. Faurecia Exhaust Systems, Inc. The Ohio Supreme Court reversed the judgment of the Court of Appeals for Miami County, citing the authority of Pettiford v. Aggarwal. The case was remanded to the Court of Appeals for further proceedings aligned with the Pettiford decision. Justices Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp concurred with the decision, while Chief Justice Brown and Justice Pfeifer dissented, opposing the acceptance of the discretionary appeal. Legal representation included Volkema, Thomas, Miller, Scott, and Warner M. Thomas Jr. for the appellees, and Freund, Freeze, Arnold, Gordon D. Arnold, and Patrick J. Janis for the appellant.