Narrative Opinion Summary
In the case of The People of the State of New York v. Augustine R. Rizzo, the New York Court of Appeals addressed a motion related to the timing of an appeal. The court granted Rizzo's motion for an extension of time to apply for permission to appeal under CPL 460.20. The motion papers submitted were treated as a timely application for the appeal, allowing Rizzo to proceed despite any prior delays. Judge Pigott did not participate in the decision. The ruling was submitted on March 19, 2007, and decided on March 22, 2007.
Legal Issues Addressed
Extension of Time for Appeal under CPL 460.20subscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court granted an extension of time to apply for permission to appeal, treating the motion papers as a timely application.
Reasoning: The court granted Rizzo's motion for an extension of time to apply for permission to appeal under CPL 460.20.
Timeliness of Appeal Applicationssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court treated the motion papers as a timely application for the appeal, allowing the appellant to proceed despite delays.
Reasoning: The motion papers submitted were treated as a timely application for the appeal, allowing Rizzo to proceed despite any prior delays.