You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Rowell v. FRANCONIA MINERALS CORP.

Citations: 706 F. Supp. 2d 891; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37915; 2010 WL 1540927Docket: Case 08 C 2517

Court: District Court, N.D. Illinois; April 16, 2010; Federal District Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

In this case, a Canadian citizen and U.S. permanent resident, residing in Illinois, filed a breach of contract lawsuit against a corporation incorporated in Canada with its principal place of business in Washington. The case, initially filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, was removed to federal court under diversity jurisdiction as per 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The primary legal issue concerned whether complete diversity existed given the dual citizenship of the plaintiff and the corporate defendant's citizenship status. The federal court, upon reviewing the jurisdictional basis, concluded that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction because both parties were deemed Canadian citizens, negating complete diversity. The court referenced the Seventh Circuit decision in Intec USA, LLC v. Engle, which established that permanent resident aliens may possess dual citizenship, impacting the plaintiff’s status. Additionally, the court highlighted that the corporate defendant was a citizen of both Canada and Washington under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1). Consequently, the case was remanded to state court, rendering the defendant's motion for summary judgment moot, and emphasizing the statutory distinction between 'State' and 'foreign state' in jurisdictional contexts.

Legal Issues Addressed

Corporate Citizenship under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1)

Application: Franconia was deemed a citizen of both its state of incorporation, Canada, and the state of its principal place of business, Washington, impacting the diversity analysis.

Reasoning: According to § 1332(c)(1), a corporation is considered a citizen of the state of incorporation and the state of its principal place of business.

Dual Citizenship of Permanent Resident Aliens

Application: Rowell, as a permanent resident alien, was considered a citizen of both Illinois and Canada based on the interpretation of dual citizenship under federal law.

Reasoning: The Seventh Circuit’s decision in Intec USA, LLC v. Engle established that permanent-resident aliens possess both state and foreign citizenship.

Interpretation of 'State' versus 'Foreign State' in Jurisdictional Analysis

Application: The statute differentiates between 'State' and 'foreign state,' and the court affirmed that dual citizenship interpretation applies, affecting the jurisdictional determination.

Reasoning: The court emphasizes that § 1332 consistently differentiates between 'State' and 'foreign state.'

Subject Matter Jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Application: The court determined that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction due to the lack of complete diversity between the parties, as both were deemed to be citizens of Canada.

Reasoning: Ultimately, the court determined that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction and remanded the case to the Circuit Court of Cook County, striking Franconia's summary judgment motion as moot.