You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Brown v. CRST/MALONE

Citations: 290 S.W.3d 95; 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 742; 2009 WL 1523020Docket: ED 92174

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals; June 2, 2009; Missouri; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

Larry D. Brown appealed the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's decision to dismiss his application for review, which was deemed untimely. The Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed the Commission's dismissal, stating that an opinion would not have precedential value. The court provided a memorandum to the parties outlining the reasons for its decision, confirming that the Commission's ruling stands.

Legal Issues Addressed

Non-precedential Judicial Decisions

Application: The court's decision was not intended to serve as precedent, highlighting that some rulings are specific to individual cases and do not establish general legal principles.

Reasoning: The Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed the Commission's dismissal, stating that an opinion would not have precedential value.

Timeliness of Application for Review

Application: The court affirmed the dismissal of an application for review due to its untimeliness, indicating strict adherence to procedural deadlines.

Reasoning: Larry D. Brown appealed the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's decision to dismiss his application for review, which was deemed untimely.