You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Melliere v. Luhr Bros., Inc.

Citations: 706 N.E.2d 40; 302 Ill. App. 3d 794; 235 Ill. Dec. 780; 1999 Ill. App. LEXIS 5Docket: 5-98-0152

Court: Appellate Court of Illinois; January 14, 1999; Illinois; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

This case involves a lawsuit filed under the Jones Act by a deckhand against Luhr Bros. Inc., following injuries sustained while working on the Ohio River. The primary legal issue pertains to the appropriateness of venue in St. Clair County, as Luhr Bros. sought to transfer the case, arguing improper venue since the incident did not occur there, and their principal place of business was in Monroe County, Illinois. The circuit court denied the transfer, finding that venue was appropriate as Luhr Bros. conducted business in St. Clair County by maintaining a hangar at the St. Louis Downtown Parks Airport. The appellate court affirmed this decision, citing that the hangar qualifies as an 'other office' under 735 ILCS 5/2-102, given its use in transporting employees and conducting business activities essential to corporate operations. Despite Luhr Bros.' contention that the hangar did not meet the statutory definition of an office, the court found the activities conducted there sufficiently localized their business presence in the county. Consequently, the appellate court upheld the trial court's ruling, affirming that Luhr Bros. is a resident of St. Clair County for venue purposes, and remanded the case for further proceedings.

Legal Issues Addressed

Conducting Business for Venue Purposes

Application: The court found that the activities conducted at the hangar, including transporting employees and preparing bids, localized business presence, satisfying venue requirements.

Reasoning: The hangar serves as a transportation facility for corporate employees and is integral to Luhr Bros.' business operations, specifically in preparing and making bids essential for securing construction projects and income.

Definition of Corporate Residence

Application: The court interpreted the statute to classify a corporation as a resident in any county where it conducts business, regardless of where the cause of action arose.

Reasoning: A corporation is considered a resident of any county where it has its registered office, other office, or is conducting business, as per 735 ILCS 5/2-102.

Interpretation of 'Other Office' in Venue Statute

Application: The court determined that Luhr Bros.' hangar, used for significant business activities, qualifies as an 'other office' under the venue statute.

Reasoning: In the case at hand, the circuit court determined that venue was appropriate in St. Clair County, asserting that Luhr Bros. was conducting business there and that its airport facility qualified as an 'other office' under the venue statute.

Venue Appropriateness Under Illinois Law

Application: The court applied the venue statute to determine that Luhr Bros. conducts business in St. Clair County, thus making venue appropriate there.

Reasoning: The circuit court conducted an evidentiary hearing and denied the transfer, determining that venue was appropriate because Luhr Bros. conducts business in St. Clair County, specifically maintaining a hangar at the St. Louis Downtown Parks Airport.