You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Breen v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANS.

Citations: 771 A.2d 879; 2001 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 248; 2001 WL 379161

Court: Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania; April 12, 2001; Pennsylvania; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

The case involves an appeal by a licensee challenging the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation's decision to suspend his driving privileges for one year following a DUI conviction in New Jersey. The appellant contended that New Jersey's DUI statute was not substantially similar to Pennsylvania's Vehicle Code as required by the Driver's License Compact. Despite a civil reservation in his guilty plea, the trial and Commonwealth Courts concluded that the conviction warranted a reciprocal license suspension. The Commonwealth Court relied on precedents such as Seibert v. Department of Transportation, which affirmed the alignment of New Jersey's statute with the Compact. The appellant also argued that the civil reservation should prevent the use of his conviction, invoking the Full Faith and Credit Clause. However, the court cited Bourdeev v. Department of Transportation, maintaining that the nature of the plea does not impede its use in civil proceedings. Judge Kelley dissented, emphasizing the need to honor New Jersey's judicial decisions under the Full Faith and Credit Clause. Ultimately, the court affirmed the trial court's dismissal of the appeal, supporting the Department's suspension action.

Legal Issues Addressed

Civil Reservation and Guilty Pleas

Application: The appellant's plea with civil reservation was argued to preclude the use of his conviction for suspension, but the court found this did not affect the conviction's validity under the Compact.

Reasoning: The agreement between the State and appellants specifically precludes evidential use of such pleas or convictions.

Driver's License Suspension under the Driver's License Compact

Application: The court upheld the suspension of the appellant's driving privileges based on a New Jersey DUI conviction, finding it substantially similar to the requirements of the Driver's License Compact.

Reasoning: Upon remand, the trial court determined that New Jersey's DUI statute is substantially similar to Article IV(a)(2) of the Driver's License Compact.

Full Faith and Credit Clause

Application: The majority rejected the argument that a guilty plea with civil reservation should preclude the use of the conviction for license suspension, citing previous case law.

Reasoning: The Licensee argued that his guilty plea, entered with civil reservation, should prevent the Department from using his conviction in the civil license suspension proceedings.