You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Lux v. Lelija

Citations: 137 N.E.2d 280; 11 Ill. App. 2d 333Docket: Gen. No. 10,969

Court: Appellate Court of Illinois; October 1, 1956; Illinois; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

In the case of Pauline Lux et al. v. Frank Lelija et al., the Illinois Appellate Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Plaintiffs, Pauline Lux and others, sought relief against Frank Lelija, both individually and as the administrator of the estate of Anna Lelija, and Mary Morse. The court's opinion, delivered by Justice Crow, supported the lower court's ruling without providing full details for publication. The case number is Gen. No. 10,969, with the decision dated September 20, 1956, and a rehearing denied on October 2, 1956. Legal representation included Richard A. Mohan for the plaintiffs and Berry O'Conor for the defendants. The decision is significant but not published in full.

Legal Issues Addressed

Affirmation of Lower Court Decision

Application: The Illinois Appellate Court upheld the decision of the lower court in the case without providing a detailed opinion for publication.

Reasoning: In the case of Pauline Lux et al. v. Frank Lelija et al., the Illinois Appellate Court affirmed the lower court's decision.

Non-publication of Full Opinion

Application: The court chose not to publish the full opinion, indicating a decision of significance but without detailed public elaboration.

Reasoning: The court's opinion, delivered by Justice Crow, supported the lower court's ruling without providing full details for publication.

Representation of Parties

Application: The legal representatives for the plaintiffs and defendants were named in the case summary, indicating their roles in the litigation process.

Reasoning: Legal representation included Richard A. Mohan for the plaintiffs and Berry O'Conor for the defendants.