Narrative Opinion Summary
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued an erratum on July 14, 2005, regarding the case Phillips v. AWH Corp., decided on July 12, 2005. The specific change pertains to the text on page 28, line 15, where the phrase “the dictionary definition does contradict any definition found in” is corrected to read “the dictionary definition does not contradict any definition found in.” This alteration clarifies the court's interpretation of the dictionary definition in relation to the case.
Legal Issues Addressed
Correction of Judicial Opinionssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court issued an erratum to correct a phrase in the original opinion, changing the interpretation of the dictionary definition's role in the case analysis.
Reasoning: The specific change pertains to the text on page 28, line 15, where the phrase 'the dictionary definition does contradict any definition found in' is corrected to read 'the dictionary definition does not contradict any definition found in.'
Interpretation of Dictionary Definitions in Legal Contextsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The corrected opinion clarifies that the dictionary definition aligns with any definition found within the case context, supporting the court's interpretative stance.
Reasoning: This alteration clarifies the court's interpretation of the dictionary definition in relation to the case.