You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Collard & Roe, P.C. v. Klein

Citations: 876 A.2d 13; 274 Conn. 904; 2005 Conn. LEXIS 240

Court: Supreme Court of Connecticut; June 7, 2005; Connecticut; State Supreme Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

The Supreme Court of Connecticut denied the petition for certification for appeal filed by defendants Arthur O. Klein and Diane L. Klein in the case against Collard and Roe, P.C. and Charles D. Rockwell. The underlying decision from the Appellate Court was reported at 87 Conn. App. 337, 865 A.2d 500 (2005). The defendants represented themselves (pro se) in support of their petition, while Aimee J. Wood and Richard E. Castiglioni opposed it. Chief Justice Sullivan did not participate in the consideration or decision of the petition. The ruling was made on June 7, 2005.

Legal Issues Addressed

Denial of Petition for Certification

Application: The Supreme Court of Connecticut denied the defendants' request for certification to appeal the decision from the Appellate Court.

Reasoning: The Supreme Court of Connecticut denied the petition for certification for appeal filed by defendants Arthur O. Klein and Diane L. Klein in the case against Collard and Roe, P.C. and Charles D. Rockwell.

Non-Participation of Justice

Application: Chief Justice Sullivan did not participate in the consideration or decision of the petition.

Reasoning: Chief Justice Sullivan did not participate in the consideration or decision of the petition.

Pro Se Representation

Application: The defendants in the case represented themselves without legal counsel in their petition for certification.

Reasoning: The defendants represented themselves (pro se) in support of their petition, while Aimee J. Wood and Richard E. Castiglioni opposed it.