You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Green Tree Acceptance, Inc. v. Zimerman

Citations: 611 So. 2d 608; 19 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1077; 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 93; 1992 WL 401967Docket: 92-01555

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida; January 12, 1993; Florida; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

In a dispute concerning the title to a motor home, Green Tree Acceptance, Inc. appealed a partial summary judgment that favored the purchasers, George and Janet Zimerman. The Carons bought the motor home and assigned their retail installment contract to Green Tree, which secured a lien on the vehicle's title. Without Green Tree's knowledge, the Carons traded the motor home to Wildcat Van Center, and the Zimermans acquired it from Wildcat, unaware of the lien. The trial court initially ruled in favor of the Zimermans, granting them superior title and requiring Green Tree to deliver a lien-free title. However, the appellate court reversed this decision, holding that the Zimermans obtained the title subject to Green Tree’s lien, as they did not have a certificate of title. The court found that Green Tree was unaware of the motor home's transfer to Wildcat and thus did not consent to the sale. Under section 672.403(2), a buyer does not obtain a lien-free title without the lienholder's knowledge and consent. The Zimermans' failure to inquire about the title condition further precluded them from being bona fide purchasers, keeping their interest subject to the lien. Consequently, while the Zimermans were affirmed as owners, the order for a lien-free title was reversed.

Legal Issues Addressed

Applicability of Section 672.403(2) to Motor Vehicles

Application: The court noted the limited applicability of section 672.403(2) regarding motor vehicles, emphasizing that consent from lienholders is necessary for transferring lien-free title.

Reasoning: Additionally, section 672.403(2) has limited applicability regarding motor vehicles, and a party cannot be considered a bona fide purchaser if they do not inquire about the title condition, thereby assuming existing liens.

Bona Fide Purchaser and Inquiry Duty

Application: The Zimermans' failure to inquire about the motor home's title condition disqualified them from being bona fide purchasers, leaving their interest subject to Green Tree's lien.

Reasoning: A party cannot be considered a bona fide purchaser if they do not inquire about the title condition, thereby assuming existing liens. The Zimermans failed to make such inquiries and thus their interest in the motor home remains subject to Green Tree's lien.

Entrustment under Section 672.403(2)

Application: Green Tree's lack of knowledge and acquiescence to the motor home's placement with Wildcat Van Center meant that Green Tree did not entrust the vehicle, and the Zimermans could not claim ownership free from the lien.

Reasoning: Green Tree did not entrust the motor home to Wildcat, and the Zimermans cannot claim ownership free from Green Tree's lien under section 672.403(2).

Lienholder's Rights and Marketable Title

Application: The appellate court determined that the Zimermans acquired the motor home subject to Green Tree's lien, as a marketable title cannot be obtained without a certificate of title and the lien was not extinguished by the transfer.

Reasoning: The appellate court reversed this decision, determining that the Zimermans acquired the title subject to Green Tree's lien, as a buyer does not obtain marketable title without a certificate of title, and the lien was not extinguished by the transfer.