You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Pembroke Development Corp. v. Carteret Savings Bank, F.A. (In Re Pembroke Development Corp.)

Citations: 121 B.R. 660; 24 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1370; 1990 Bankr. LEXIS 2540Docket: 18-23192

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.; December 4, 1990; Us Bankruptcy; United States Bankruptcy Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

This case involves a dispute between a debtor, Pembroke Development Corporation, and a creditor, Carteret Savings Bank, concerning a $14.5 million construction loan. The debtor defaulted on the loan and sought injunctive and declaratory relief to prevent the creditor from drawing on letters of credit totaling $1 million, which were pledged as collateral but issued at the request of non-debtor customers. Initially, the Bankruptcy Court granted a Temporary Restraining Order to stop the creditor from accessing the letters of credit, but later dissolved the order upon determining that the credits were not part of the debtor's estate. The creditor maintained that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction for the declaratory relief claim because the letters of credit involved third parties. The court concurred, concluding that since the debtor had no interest in the letters of credit, which were tied to third-party contracts, it lacked jurisdiction. Consequently, the court granted the creditor's Motion to Dismiss, effectively dismissing the debtor's complaint.

Legal Issues Addressed

Property of the Bankruptcy Estate

Application: The court determined that letters of credit pledged as collateral, but issued at the request of non-debtor customers, do not constitute property of the debtor’s estate.

Reasoning: The Bankruptcy Court initially issued a Temporary Restraining Order preventing the creditor from drawing on the letters, but later dissolved it, concluding that the letters of credit were not property of the debtor’s estate.

Subject Matter Jurisdiction in Bankruptcy

Application: The court found it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the debtor's claim for declaratory relief, as the letters of credit involved third parties and did not affect the debtor's estate.

Reasoning: The court agreed with the creditor, stating that the debtor had no interest in the letters of credit, as they were linked to contracts involving non-debtor customers, the issuing bank, and the creditor.