Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Co. v. Randall
Citations: 981 A.2d 1078; 293 Conn. 934; 2009 Conn. LEXIS 475Docket: SC 18444
Court: Supreme Court of Connecticut; October 13, 2009; Connecticut; State Supreme Court
The Supreme Court of Connecticut granted the defendant's petition for certification for appeal, focusing on whether the Appellate Court correctly decided that the trial court should have filled in missing words in a nonsolicitation clause of an employment agreement without applying the equitable remedy of reformation. The Appellate Court had concluded that the parties' intention to restrict certain conduct was evident. Justices Scott S. Centrella represented the petitioner's interests, while Sheila A. Huddleston, Glenn M. Cunningham, and Lee A. Duval opposed the petition. Chief Justice Rogers did not participate in this case. The appeal stems from the Appellate Court's ruling on case 115 ConnApp. 89, 971 A.2d 796 (2009).