You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.

Citations: 543 U.S. 924; 125 S. Ct. 317; 160 L. Ed. 2d 221; 2004 U.S. LEXIS 6696Docket: 04-70

Court: Supreme Court of the United States; October 12, 2004; Federal Supreme Court; Federal Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

The Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in the consolidated cases of Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc. (No. 04-70) and another related case (No. 04-79), specifically addressing Question 1 from the petition in case No. 04-70. The Court allocated a total of 90 minutes for oral arguments. The decisions from the lower courts were reported as 333 F.3d 1248 for No. 04-70 and 370 F.3d 124 for No. 04-79. The case was decided on October 12, 2004, by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.

Legal Issues Addressed

Allocation of Oral Argument Time

Application: The Court allocated a specific amount of time for oral arguments to ensure the cases were adequately addressed, reflecting the importance and complexity of the issues at hand.

Reasoning: The Court allocated a total of 90 minutes for oral arguments.

Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in Consolidated Cases

Application: The Supreme Court exercised its discretion to grant certiorari in consolidated cases involving Exxon Mobil Corp. and other parties, addressing specific legal questions presented in the petitions.

Reasoning: The Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in the consolidated cases of Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc. (No. 04-70) and another related case (No. 04-79), specifically addressing Question 1 from the petition in case No. 04-70.

Review of Lower Court Decisions

Application: The Supreme Court's review included examining the decisions made by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, referencing the reported decisions to ensure a thorough understanding of the lower court's reasoning.

Reasoning: The decisions from the lower courts were reported as 333 F.3d 1248 for No. 04-70 and 370 F.3d 124 for No. 04-79.

Timeline and Jurisdiction of Appeals

Application: The case was decided by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals prior to reaching the Supreme Court, indicating the procedural path taken through the judicial system.

Reasoning: The case was decided on October 12, 2004, by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.