Narrative Opinion Summary
The Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in the consolidated cases of Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc. (No. 04-70) and another related case (No. 04-79), specifically addressing Question 1 from the petition in case No. 04-70. The Court allocated a total of 90 minutes for oral arguments. The decisions from the lower courts were reported as 333 F.3d 1248 for No. 04-70 and 370 F.3d 124 for No. 04-79. The case was decided on October 12, 2004, by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.
Legal Issues Addressed
Allocation of Oral Argument Timesubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The Court allocated a specific amount of time for oral arguments to ensure the cases were adequately addressed, reflecting the importance and complexity of the issues at hand.
Reasoning: The Court allocated a total of 90 minutes for oral arguments.
Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in Consolidated Casessubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The Supreme Court exercised its discretion to grant certiorari in consolidated cases involving Exxon Mobil Corp. and other parties, addressing specific legal questions presented in the petitions.
Reasoning: The Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in the consolidated cases of Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc. (No. 04-70) and another related case (No. 04-79), specifically addressing Question 1 from the petition in case No. 04-70.
Review of Lower Court Decisionssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The Supreme Court's review included examining the decisions made by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, referencing the reported decisions to ensure a thorough understanding of the lower court's reasoning.
Reasoning: The decisions from the lower courts were reported as 333 F.3d 1248 for No. 04-70 and 370 F.3d 124 for No. 04-79.
Timeline and Jurisdiction of Appealssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The case was decided by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals prior to reaching the Supreme Court, indicating the procedural path taken through the judicial system.
Reasoning: The case was decided on October 12, 2004, by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.