You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

K & K Development Corp. v. Columbia Banking Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

Citations: 386 S.E.2d 226; 96 N.C. App. 474; 1989 N.C. App. LEXIS 1018Docket: 8910SC283

Court: Court of Appeals of North Carolina; December 5, 1989; North Carolina; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

In the case involving K. K Development Corporation and several defendants, including Columbia Banking Federal Savings and Loan Association, the North Carolina Court of Appeals addressed the appeal of an interlocutory order that granted summary judgment to the defendants and awarded attorney's fees. The court recognized the appeal's validity under N.C.Gen. Stat. 1-277(a) and N.C.Gen. Stat. 7A-27(d) due to the order's effect on a substantial right. The primary legal issue was the priority of liens, where the plaintiff argued a genuine issue of material fact regarding their lien's priority over Columbia's mortgage on Lot 56. The court determined that since the plaintiff's work began after Columbia's mortgage was recorded, the lien could not have priority. Consequently, the summary judgment was upheld. Additionally, the court addressed the award of attorney's fees under G.S. 6-21.5, concluding that the plaintiff's pleadings did not entirely lack justiciable issues and were made in good faith, leading to the reversal of the fee award. The court also denied a motion for sanctions against the plaintiff, noting the appeal was not frivolous as it was properly grounded and pursued without improper motives. Ultimately, the summary judgment was affirmed, and the attorney's fees award was reversed.

Legal Issues Addressed

Appealability of Interlocutory Orders

Application: The appeal was deemed valid under specific statutes because the interlocutory order affected a substantial right due to the attorney's fee award.

Reasoning: The Court of Appeals of North Carolina acknowledged the appeal's validity under N.C.Gen. Stat. 1-277(a) and N.C.Gen. Stat. 7A-27(d) since the order affected a substantial right due to the attorney's fee award.

Award of Attorney's Fees under G.S. 6-21.5

Application: The court reversed the award of attorney's fees, finding that the plaintiff's pleadings did not completely lack justiciable issues and were made in good faith.

Reasoning: G.S. 6-21.5 permits a trial court to award reasonable attorney's fees to the prevailing party only if there is a complete absence of a justiciable issue of law or fact raised by the losing party in any pleading.

Frivolous Appeals

Application: The court denied the defendants' motion for sanctions, stating the plaintiff's appeal was not frivolous as it was not pursued for improper purposes and met procedural requirements.

Reasoning: The court rejected the defendants' arguments for sanctions and denied the motion, affirming the grant of summary judgment while reversing the attorney's fees award.

Priority of Liens and Deeds of Trust

Application: The court concluded that the plaintiff's lien could not take priority over the mortgage recorded by Columbia because the work commenced after the mortgage was recorded.

Reasoning: Since the plaintiff's work began on June 8, 1987—after the mortgage was recorded—the plaintiff could not establish priority over Columbia's deed of trust.