Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Batiste v. American Home Products Corp.
Citations: 233 S.E.2d 921; 292 N.C. 466; 1977 N.C. LEXIS 1110
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina; April 4, 1977; North Carolina; State Supreme Court
Alice M. Batiste filed a petition for discretionary review following a decision from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, which was reported at 32 N.C.App. 1, 231 S.E.2d 269. The Supreme Court of North Carolina, in its ruling on April 5, 1977, denied the petition. The case involved Batiste as the plaintiff against American Home Products Corporation and others as defendants. The legal representation included Mraz, Aycock, and Casstevens for the plaintiff and Golding, Crews, Meekins, Gordon, and Gray for the defendants. The decision reflects the court's stance on the discretionary review process under General Statute 7A-31.