You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Green Tree Financial Servicing Corp. v. Smithwick

Citations: 121 F.3d 211; 1997 WL 476410Docket: 96-41089

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit; September 9, 1997; Federal Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

In this case, Green Tree Financial Servicing Corporation appealed the district court's affirmation of a bankruptcy court's decision concerning the post-confirmation interest rate on its oversecured claim against debtors who filed a Chapter 13 plan. Initially, the debtors proposed an interest rate lower than the contract rate, to which Green Tree objected. The bankruptcy court, applying its Local Rule, set the interest rate at 11.00%, a decision upheld by the district court. On appeal, the appellate court examined the appropriate post-confirmation interest rate under Section 1325(a)(5)(B)(ii), noting that the Fifth Circuit had not previously addressed this in Chapter 13 cases. The appellate court referenced the 'coerced loan' model, which suggests that the interest rate should reflect the market rate for similar loans. The court emphasized minimizing litigation costs and proposed using the contract rate as a rebuttable presumption unless evidence supports a different rate. It found that the lower court failed to determine the correct discount rate, thus reversing and remanding the case for further proceedings to ensure risk factors are adequately addressed.

Legal Issues Addressed

Contract Rate Presumption for Interest Rate Calculation

Application: The court suggested using the contract rate as a rebuttable presumption for setting the interest rate, unless compelling evidence is presented to support a different rate.

Reasoning: The court proposes using the contract rate with a rebuttable presumption for setting the appropriate interest rate, which balances judicial economy with accurate risk assessment.

Cramdown Interest Rate under Chapter 13

Application: The appellate court highlighted the use of the 'coerced loan' model to determine the cramdown interest rate, which should reflect what the secured creditor would charge for a similar loan at the plan's effective date.

Reasoning: The court argued that Chapter 13 effectively coerces creditors into extending new credit, requiring them to cover both the cost of capital and the ongoing lending relationship.

Post-Confirmation Interest Rate Determination under Chapter 13

Application: The appellate court evaluated the method for determining the post-confirmation interest rate on an oversecured claim, emphasizing the need for a rate that reflects market conditions and the creditor's risks.

Reasoning: The appellate court analyzed whether the bankruptcy court erred in selecting the post-confirmation interest rate under Section 1325(a)(5)(B)(ii), which requires that secured creditors receive payments totaling at least the present value of their allowed claims.