Narrative Opinion Summary
In the case of Brandon Associates v. Castle Management, the Supreme Court of Michigan addressed a motion regarding the timeliness of an application for leave to appeal. The Court denied the motion to strike the application as untimely. However, it also denied the application for leave to appeal the November 18, 2004 judgment from the Court of Appeals, concluding that the issues raised did not warrant review by the Supreme Court. The decision was issued on June 28, 2005, under docket number 128054.
Legal Issues Addressed
Review by Supreme Courtsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The Supreme Court of Michigan determined that the issues raised in the appeal did not merit further review, leading to the denial of the application for leave to appeal.
Reasoning: However, it also denied the application for leave to appeal the November 18, 2004 judgment from the Court of Appeals, concluding that the issues raised did not warrant review by the Supreme Court.
Timeliness of Application for Leave to Appealsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The Supreme Court of Michigan considered the timeliness of the application for leave to appeal and denied the motion to strike it as untimely.
Reasoning: The Court denied the motion to strike the application as untimely.