You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Washington Road. Developers, LLC v. Weeks

Citations: 549 S.E.2d 416; 249 Ga. App. 582; 2001 Fulton County D. Rep. 1619; 2001 Ga. App. LEXIS 563Docket: A01A1220

Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia; May 9, 2001; Georgia; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

In this case, the court addressed the liability of Washington Road Developers, LLC (Washington), a developer of a residential subdivision, upon selling a townhouse that was later found to have structural deficiencies. The purchaser, Melba Weeks, sued Washington and Vintson Construction Company (Vintson) for breach of an implied duty to construct the residence in a fit and workmanlike manner and for negligent construction. Washington, which hired Vintson as an independent contractor, sought summary judgment, claiming it was merely the seller and not responsible for construction defects. The court affirmed the trial court's denial of Washington's motion, emphasizing that a builder-seller like Washington cannot avoid liability for negligent construction by attributing the blame solely to independent contractors. The court referenced the precedent set in Seely v. Loyd H. Johnson Constr. Co. and distinguished the case from Collins v. Ralston, Ogletree, Inc., where the developer had no role in selecting the builder. The court concluded that Washington's involvement in selecting the builder and selling the townhouse precluded it from disclaiming liability. Consequently, the judgment against Washington was affirmed, with concurring opinions from judges Smith and Barnes.

Legal Issues Addressed

Contractual Obligations and Builder's Warranty

Application: Although the purchase contract stated Vintson provided the builder's warranty and Washington's responsibility ended at closing, the court found Washington liable due to its role in selecting the builder.

Reasoning: The purchase contract indicated that Vintson provided the builder's warranty and stated Washington's responsibility ended at closing. However, Washington and Weeks were the only parties to this contract.

Distinction Between Developer and Builder-Seller Liability

Application: The court distinguished between cases where a developer is not involved in construction and those where the developer, like Washington, selects the builder and sells the property.

Reasoning: In contrast, Collins v. Ralston, Ogletree, Inc. was distinguished as it involved a developer who did not build the house and had no contractual relationship with the builder selected by the purchasers.

Liability of Builder-Seller for Construction Defects

Application: The court held that a builder-seller cannot evade liability for negligent construction by attributing fault solely to independent contractors, as Washington selected the builder and sold the townhouse.

Reasoning: The court referenced Seely v. Loyd H. Johnson Constr. Co., establishing that a builder-seller cannot evade liability for negligent construction by blaming independent contractors.