You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Kurtzman v. Applied Analytical Industries, Inc.

Citations: 502 S.E.2d 594; 347 N.C. 586; 1998 N.C. LEXIS 89Docket: 103PA97

Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina; February 4, 1998; North Carolina; State Supreme Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

The Supreme Court of North Carolina addressed the petition for rehearing filed by Plaintiff Lewis Kurtzman concerning the case against Applied Analytical Industries, Inc. The court considered the petition under Rule 31 of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure. Ultimately, the petition for rehearing was denied during a court conference on February 5, 1998. The decision has been certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals, with prior reports referencing case number 347 N.C. 329 and 493 S.E.2d 420. Legal representation included John R. Wester and Frank H. Lancaster for Applied Analytical Industries, and Gary K. Shipman, Jennifer L. Umbaugh, and C. Wes Hodges, II for Kurtzman, among others.

Legal Issues Addressed

Certification of Decision to Lower Court

Application: The denial of the petition for rehearing was certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Reasoning: The decision has been certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals, with prior reports referencing case number 347 N.C. 329 and 493 S.E.2d 420.

Petition for Rehearing under Appellate Procedure Rule 31

Application: The Supreme Court of North Carolina reviewed and ultimately denied the petition for rehearing filed by Plaintiff Lewis Kurtzman.

Reasoning: The Supreme Court of North Carolina addressed the petition for rehearing filed by Plaintiff Lewis Kurtzman concerning the case against Applied Analytical Industries, Inc. The court considered the petition under Rule 31 of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure.