Narrative Opinion Summary
The Supreme Court of North Carolina addressed the appeal in the case of Reichhold Chemicals, Inc. v. Anil B. Goel, No. 604P01, on February 27, 2003. The Plaintiff, Reichhold Chemicals, filed a notice of appeal under G.S. 7A-30, while the Defendant, Anil B. Goel, submitted a motion to dismiss the appeal, arguing that there was no substantial constitutional question at stake. The Court allowed the motion to dismiss the appeal. Additionally, the Plaintiff sought discretionary review of the North Carolina Court of Appeals' decision under G.S. 7A-31, which was denied by the Court. Both orders were certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals. The prior report of the case is cited as 146 N.C.App. 137, 555 S.E.2d 281.
Legal Issues Addressed
Appeal Dismissal Due to Lack of Substantial Constitutional Questionsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The Supreme Court of North Carolina dismissed the appeal because the defendant successfully argued that the appeal did not raise a substantial constitutional question.
Reasoning: The Defendant, Anil B. Goel, submitted a motion to dismiss the appeal, arguing that there was no substantial constitutional question at stake. The Court allowed the motion to dismiss the appeal.
Discretionary Review Under G.S. 7A-31subscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The plaintiff's request for discretionary review of the North Carolina Court of Appeals' decision was denied by the Supreme Court.
Reasoning: Additionally, the Plaintiff sought discretionary review of the North Carolina Court of Appeals' decision under G.S. 7A-31, which was denied by the Court.