You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Parker v. Farmway Credit Union

Citations: 718 P.2d 643; 11 Kan. App. 2d 223; 1 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1400; 1986 Kan. App. LEXIS 1104Docket: 57,478

Court: Court of Appeals of Kansas; May 8, 1986; Kansas; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

In a dispute over the enforcement of a security interest, the administrator of a decedent's estate challenged the district court's decision allowing a creditor, Farmway Credit Union, to repossess and sell collateral without filing a claim in probate court. Prior to his death, the decedent had secured debts with Farmway, and an agreement existed for the sale of collateral. After the decedent's passing, his heirs adhered to this agreement. The administrator contested the creditor's actions, arguing that such repossession violated the administrator's rights under K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 59-1401. The court, however, ruled that these rights did not supersede the creditor's self-help repossession rights under K.S.A. 84-9-503, given the pre-existing security agreement. Additionally, the court affirmed the summary judgment, noting that the administrator failed to present new factual disputes, referencing the principle from Brick v. City of Wichita regarding discovery. The court concluded that the creditor's actions were justified and upheld the lower court's decision, emphasizing the validity of the security agreement and the lack of conflicting facts necessitating further discovery.

Legal Issues Addressed

Administrator's Rights vs. Secured Creditor's Rights

Application: The court held that an administrator's right to possess a decedent's property does not conflict with a secured creditor's right to self-help repossession under K.S.A. 84-9-503.

Reasoning: There is no conflict between an administrator's right to possess a decedent's property under K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 59-1401 and a secured creditor's right to self-help repossession.

Rights of Secured Creditors in Estate Proceedings

Application: The court affirmed that a secured creditor can enforce its security interest in a debtor's property after the debtor's death without filing a claim in the estate proceedings, provided a valid security agreement exists.

Reasoning: Farmway Credit Union to enforce its security interest in personal property owned by Douglas without needing to file a claim in the estate proceedings or initiate a foreclosure action.

Self-Help Repossession Post-Death

Application: The court found that self-help repossession is permissible post-death if a valid agreement exists, and prior arrangements by the decedent are respected.

Reasoning: A secured creditor can take possession and sell the property of a deceased debtor if there is a valid agreement in place.

Summary Judgment and Completion of Discovery

Application: The court upheld the granting of summary judgment despite incomplete discovery, as no new facts were presented that could alter the outcome based on existing uncontroverted facts.

Reasoning: Since no pertinent facts remained to be discovered, the court deemed the uncontroverted facts admitted under Rule 141, 235 Kan. cx.