You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. Harris

Citations: 672 P.2d 1384; 66 Or. App. 165; 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 4038Docket: 50932; CA A27568

Court: Court of Appeals of Oregon; December 14, 1983; Oregon; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

In this case, a claimant appealed a district court order that permitted the State Accident Insurance Fund Corporation (SAIF) to recover funds paid for a workers' compensation permanent partial disability award. The claimant had initially been awarded $2,720, but after payment, the Workers' Compensation Board reversed the award, concluding there was no permanent partial disability. SAIF then sought recovery of the overpayment through the district court. However, the claimant argued that the district court lacked jurisdiction over such matters. The Oregon Court of Appeals agreed, vacating the district court's order and clarifying that under ORS 656.268(4), only the Workers' Compensation Hearings Division and the Board have the authority to resolve disputes and recover overpayments related to workers' compensation claims. The court underscored the legislative intent to keep these matters within the specialized administrative framework, separate from trial courts. As a result, the appeal was resolved without addressing the claimant's additional arguments concerning res judicata or collateral estoppel.

Legal Issues Addressed

Exclusive Authority of Workers' Compensation Board

Application: The case reaffirmed that the Workers' Compensation Board and Hearings Division maintain exclusive jurisdiction over recovery of overpayments related to workers' compensation claims.

Reasoning: The court emphasized that under ORS 656.268(4), the authority to recover overpayments lies exclusively with the Workers' Compensation Hearings Division and the Board, which have jurisdiction over all claims and disputes related to workers' compensation.

Jurisdiction of Workers' Compensation Disputes

Application: The court determined that the district court did not have jurisdiction to allow SAIF to recover overpaid workers' compensation funds.

Reasoning: The Oregon Court of Appeals agreed with Harris, vacating the district court's order. The court emphasized that under ORS 656.268(4), the authority to recover overpayments lies exclusively with the Workers' Compensation Hearings Division and the Board.

Legislative Intent in Workers' Compensation Jurisdiction

Application: The decision highlighted the legislative intent to separate jurisdiction of workers' compensation matters from trial courts.

Reasoning: The legislature's intent was to keep jurisdiction for these matters separate from trial courts, as evidenced by the structure of the Workers' Compensation Act.