You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Ditcharo v. Stepanek

Citations: 538 So. 2d 309; 1989 WL 4647Docket: 88-CA-572

Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal; February 16, 1989; Louisiana; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

In this case, the plaintiffs sought rescission of their home purchase due to an undisclosed termite infestation. They alleged that the termite inspector falsely certified the property as termite-free, which was known to the sellers and real estate brokers. The plaintiffs aimed to recover the purchase price and additional damages. The court found that the brokers failed to disclose the infestation, violating their duty to provide accurate information. The termite inspector was also found liable for misrepresenting the property's condition. The trial court awarded the plaintiffs repair costs and attorney's fees, while dismissing indemnification claims against the inspector and insurance. On appeal, the court upheld the trial court's findings, including the award of nonpecuniary damages for mental anguish, recognizing the impact of the breach on the plaintiffs' interests. The Stepaneks were held liable under LSA-C.C. art. 2545 for undisclosed defects, and attorney's fees were limited to their liability. The judgment was affirmed with amendments, addressing procedural issues regarding the appeal response.

Legal Issues Addressed

Award of Attorney's Fees Under LSA-C.C. art. 2545

Application: The court awarded attorney's fees against the Stepaneks under LSA-C.C. art. 2545 for failing to disclose known defects, but restricted such fees to the Stepaneks only.

Reasoning: Louisiana law permits such fees only by statute or contract. The fees were awarded under LSA-C.C. art. 2545, which holds sellers liable for undisclosed defects.

Duty of Disclosure by Real Estate Agents

Application: Real estate brokers Murdock Richard and Paul Richard were found liable for failing to disclose known termite infestation, thus breaching their duty to provide accurate property information.

Reasoning: Murdock and Paul Richard were found to have known about the infestation and had a duty to disclose it.

Indemnification Claims in Tort

Application: The defendants' third-party indemnification claim against Adams and Northbrook was dismissed due to the Richards' independent duty to the plaintiffs.

Reasoning: The trial judge's findings of liability against Murdock Richard and Paul Richard are upheld, as is the dismissal of their indemnification claim against Adams and Northbrook.

Liability for Misrepresentation by Termite Inspector

Application: Jules Adams was found liable for intentionally misrepresenting the property's condition by issuing a false termite-free certificate.

Reasoning: Adams was found to have intentionally misrepresented the property's condition by issuing a misleading termite certificate.

Liability for Nonpecuniary Damages in Contract

Application: The Stepaneks were held liable for nonpecuniary damages under Civil Code Article 1998, as they should have foreseen the impact of their breach on the plaintiffs' nonpecuniary interests.

Reasoning: The court reasoned that the Stepaneks, as vendors, should have recognized that the sale of the house would be significant to the Ditcharos beyond mere financial investment.

Recovery of Nonpecuniary Damages in Tort

Application: The plaintiffs were granted nonpecuniary damages for mental anguish and inconvenience as a result of the defendants' tortious actions, supported by Civil Code art. 2315.

Reasoning: The court found the Ditcharos entitled to recover nonpecuniary damages for mental anguish and inconvenience resulting from the defendants' tortious actions.

Rescission of Contract Due to Fraudulent Misrepresentation

Application: The plaintiffs sought rescission of their home purchase based on the defendants' failure to disclose termite infestation, which was fraudulently misrepresented as absent at the time of sale.

Reasoning: Joann Cangelosi and Dominick Ditcharo, Jr. filed suit...seeking rescission of their home purchase due to undisclosed termite infestation.