You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Morrow v. Parker

Citations: 981 So. 2d 859; 2008 WL 1886701Docket: 43,097-CA to 43,099-CA

Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal; April 30, 2008; Louisiana; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

The case before the Louisiana Court of Appeal involved the plaintiffs, Betty B. Morrow and Ralph Morrow, against defendants Elloise M. Aldy Parker and Progressive Security Insurance Company, following an accident caused by Alvin Parker. The plaintiffs sought damages in Jackson Parish, but the service of process on Mrs. Parker occurred outside the prescriptive period. The State of Louisiana intervened to recover workers' compensation payments. Initially, the defendants did not raise exceptions in their answer; however, they later filed exceptions of no cause and no right of action, along with prescription. The trial court granted the exception of prescription, dismissing the case for being filed in an improper venue. On appeal, the court found that Mrs. Parker had waived her right to challenge the venue by filing an answer without raising the exception. The court also concluded that the actions were timely and properly filed in Jackson Parish, reversing the trial court's decision. Mrs. Parker was ordered to pay filing fees, as the venue rules allowed the suit where the wrongful conduct occurred, aligning with the acknowledgment of her as the sole legatee and a proper defendant under Louisiana procedural law.

Legal Issues Addressed

Prescription and Venue in Civil Actions

Application: The court addressed the issue of prescription involving claims filed in an improper venue and noted that prescription is interrupted only for defendants served within the prescriptive period when an action is commenced in an improper venue.

Reasoning: According to La. C.C. art. 3462, prescription is interrupted only for defendants served within the prescriptive period when an action is commenced in an improper venue.

Proper Venue for Tort Actions

Application: The court determined that the tort actions were properly filed in Jackson Parish, as the alleged conduct and damages occurred there, aligning with the general venue rules for actions against individuals.

Reasoning: The court determined that the tort actions were properly filed in Jackson Parish, where the alleged conduct and damages happened.

Recognition of Proper Defendant

Application: Mrs. Parker was recognized as a proper defendant due to her status as the sole legatee of her deceased husband, making the suits timely filed in the correct venue.

Reasoning: Mrs. Parker was recognized as the sole legatee of her deceased husband, making her a proper defendant per La. C.C.P. art. 427.

Waiver of Venue Exception

Application: The court found that Mrs. Parker waived her right to raise the venue exception when her attorney filed an answer without including it, thereby making the venue proper for the subsequent filing of the prescription exception.

Reasoning: However, Mrs. Parker waived her right to raise the venue exception when Snellings filed an answer without including it.