You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

FLANIGAN'S ENTERPRISES v. Barnett Bank

Citations: 614 So. 2d 1198; 19 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1230; 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2407Docket: 92-104

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida; March 4, 1993; Florida; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

In this case, Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. appealed a judgment that estopped it from seeking damages against Barnett Bank of Naples, which held a perfected security interest in a liquor license following a default by Spirits Orlando South, Inc. Flanigan's claimed a statutory landlord's lien under Florida Statutes, but the court found it had only an unperfected security interest. Barnett Bank foreclosed and sold the liquor license, after which Flanigan's alleged its lien was annihilated. The court addressed whether Section 818.01, a criminal statute prohibiting the sale of property under a lien without consent, applied to intangible property like liquor licenses. It concluded that the statute did not provide civil liability against Barnett, and the U.C.C. implicitly repealed the consent requirement. The court also determined that statutory landlord's liens do not attach to general intangibles, further ruling that Barnett was within its rights to dispose of the license without notice to Flanigan's. The judgment affirmed the lower court's decision, aligning with the rationale that creditors must protect their interests proactively in accordance with statutory requirements.

Legal Issues Addressed

Applicability of Section 818.01 to Intangible Property

Application: The court determined that Section 818.01 of the Florida Statutes, while broadly referring to personal property, did not provide grounds for civil liability against Barnett Bank for the sale of the liquor license.

Reasoning: The court affirmed the trial court's findings, supporting its estoppel ruling and concluding that section 818.01 did not provide grounds for civil liability against Barnett.

Estoppel in Security Interest Claims

Application: The court found Flanigan's Enterprises estopped from asserting a prior statutory lien that could have prevented the loss of its lien after the sale, as its actions were inconsistent with earlier claims.

Reasoning: The trial judge concluded that Flanigan's unperfected security interest claim was inconsistent with its later assertion of a prior statutory lien, which, if timely asserted, could have prevented the loss of its lien after the sale to Hickory Point.

Statutory Landlord's Lien and General Intangibles

Application: The court ruled that Flanigan's statutory landlord's lien did not attach to the liquor license, a general intangible, because proper filing was not completed prior to 1981.

Reasoning: Regarding the statutory landlord's lien, it is determined that such a lien for rent under section 83.08(2) does not attach to a lessee's interest in a liquor license, classified as a general intangible.

U.C.C. and the Repeal of Written Consent Requirements

Application: The court concluded that the U.C.C. implicitly repealed the requirement of written consent under section 818.01, allowing Barnett Bank to dispose of the collateral after default without needing consent from other parties.

Reasoning: Ultimately, the conclusion is that the U.C.C. has implicitly repealed the written consent requirement of section 818.01.