Narrative Opinion Summary
The Supreme Court of the United States decided on October 12, 1964, in the case of Cooper-Jarrett, Inc. et al. v. United States et al. (379 U.S. 6). The appeal originated from the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. The Court granted motions to affirm the lower court's judgment, resulting in an affirmation without elaboration on the legal reasoning or specifics of the case. Legal representation included Kenneth E. Midgley and others for the appellants, and Solicitor General Cox along with others for the United States and the appellees, Eastern Railroads et al. The decision emphasizes the Court's role in upholding the lower court's ruling.
Legal Issues Addressed
Appellate Review and Affirmationsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The Supreme Court's decision to affirm without further explanation underscores its agreement with the lower court's ruling, indicating no error warranting reversal.
Reasoning: The Court granted motions to affirm the lower court's judgment, resulting in an affirmation without elaboration on the legal reasoning or specifics of the case.
Role of the Solicitor Generalsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The involvement of the Solicitor General in representing the United States indicates the federal government's interest and participation in the case.
Reasoning: Legal representation included Kenneth E. Midgley and others for the appellants, and Solicitor General Cox along with others for the United States and the appellees, Eastern Railroads et al.