You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Alfred Lee Mauldin v. State

Citation: Not availableDocket: M1999-00532-CCA-R3-CD

Court: Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee; March 16, 2000; Tennessee; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

In this case, the Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee addressed an appeal concerning the denial of a motion for expungement by the Maury County Circuit Court. The appellant sought expungement for multiple cases, some involving convictions stemming from nolo contendere pleas and others being nolle prosequi. The court affirmed the trial court's decision that convictions from nolo contendere pleas in case numbers 7306, 7307, and 7308 are not eligible for expungement under Tennessee law. Conversely, the court identified an error in denying expungement for case numbers 9110-9114, which were nolle prosequi, and remanded the matter for the issuance of an expungement order, recognizing no discretion exists for the trial judge in such instances under Tennessee Code Annotated § 40-32-101(a)(3). Additionally, the court held that case number 7165, retired from the docket but not dismissed, remains ineligible for expungement unless officially dismissed. The court also considered the state's argument against expunging criminal history records held by the Department of Correction, citing insufficient evidence and legal exemptions. Ultimately, the decision was affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings consistent with the court's findings.

Legal Issues Addressed

Expungement Eligibility for Nolo Contendere Pleas

Application: The court held that convictions resulting from nolo contendere pleas are not eligible for expungement under Tennessee law.

Reasoning: The court affirmed the trial court's denial of expungement for all convicted offenses, as under Tennessee law, convictions resulting from nolo contendere pleas in case numbers 7306, 7307, and 7308 are not eligible for expungement.

Expungement of Criminal History Records

Application: The state argued against the expungement of criminal history records maintained by the Department of Correction due to lack of evidence and legal exemptions.

Reasoning: The state also argued against expunging any criminal history records maintained by the Department of Correction, citing a lack of evidence and applicable exemptions under the law.

Expungement of Nolle Prosequi Cases

Application: The court determined that cases nolle prosequi are entitled to expungement, and the trial judge has no discretion to deny such requests.

Reasoning: The court found an error concerning case numbers 9110-9114, which were nolle prosequi; the state conceded that these cases are entitled to expungement under Tennessee Code Annotated § 40-32-101(a)(3). The court emphasized that the trial judge has no discretion to deny such requests.

Retired Cases and Expungement Eligibility

Application: The court confirmed that a case retired from the docket but not dismissed is not eligible for expungement unless it is formally dismissed.

Reasoning: Additionally, the court confirmed that case number 7165, which was retired from the docket but not dismissed, remains ineligible for expungement unless formally dismissed in the future.