You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Baldwin v. Pirelli Armstrong

Citation: Not availableDocket: 01A01-9804-CV-00195

Court: Court of Appeals of Tennessee; March 11, 1999; Tennessee; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

The Court of Appeals of Tennessee addressed petitions to rehear filed by Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corporation and the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum and Plastic Workers of America, along with URW Local Union 670, in the case involving plaintiffs Kevin T. Brown and others representing a class of similarly situated individuals. The court determined that the petitions lacked merit and subsequently denied both petitions to rehear. The order was issued by the presiding judge, Ben H. Cantrell, along with Judges William C. Koch, Jr. and William B. Cain.

Legal Issues Addressed

Judicial Review Process

Application: The appellate court's decision involved a review by multiple judges, confirming the procedural aspect of appellate review.

Reasoning: The order was issued by the presiding judge, Ben H. Cantrell, along with Judges William C. Koch, Jr. and William B. Cain.

Petitions to Rehear

Application: The Court of Appeals of Tennessee evaluated the petitions to rehear filed by the defendants and determined that they lacked merit.

Reasoning: The court determined that the petitions lacked merit and subsequently denied both petitions to rehear.