You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Rosenblatt v. American Cyanamid Co.

Citation: 382 U.S. 110Docket: 501

Court: Supreme Court of the United States; November 22, 1965; Federal Supreme Court; Federal Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

The Supreme Court of the United States dismissed the appeal in Maurice Rosenblatt v. American Cyanamid Co. for lack of a substantial federal question. The decision was issued on November 15, 1965, with a rehearing denied on January 17, 1966. Justice Harlan did not participate in the case's consideration or decision. The legal representation for the appellant included E. Barrett Prettyman, Jr. and Thomas J. O'Toole.

Legal Issues Addressed

Dismissal for Lack of Substantial Federal Question

Application: The appeal was dismissed by the Supreme Court because it did not present a substantial federal question warranting review.

Reasoning: The Supreme Court of the United States dismissed the appeal in Maurice Rosenblatt v. American Cyanamid Co. for lack of a substantial federal question.

Non-Participation of a Justice

Application: Justice Harlan did not participate in the consideration or decision of the case, indicating that not all justices were involved in the decision-making process.

Reasoning: Justice Harlan did not participate in the case's consideration or decision.