You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Giles W. Stadler v. State Board of Equalization of California

Citation: 380 U.S. 252Docket: 797

Court: Supreme Court of the United States; March 7, 1965; Federal Supreme Court; Federal Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

The Supreme Court of the United States issued a per curiam decision on March 8, 1965, regarding the case of Giles W. Stadler et al. v. State Board of Equalization of California. The Court granted the motion to dismiss the appeal, concluding that there was no substantial federal question presented in the case. As a result, the appeal was dismissed. Counsel for the appellants included Theodore W. Russell and R. Y. Schureman, while the appellee was represented by California's Attorney General Thomas C. Lynch, along with Dan Kaufman and Neal J. Gobar.

Legal Issues Addressed

Dismissal of Appeal for Lack of Substantial Federal Question

Application: The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal after determining that the case did not present any substantial federal question.

Reasoning: The Court granted the motion to dismiss the appeal, concluding that there was no substantial federal question presented in the case.