Narrative Opinion Summary
The Supreme Court of the United States issued a per curiam decision in the case of Fred L. Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, reversing the judgment of the Court of Appeals of Alabama. The ruling referenced precedents, specifically Cole v. Arkansas and Williams v. Georgia, indicating a legal basis for the reversal. Justice White did not participate in the consideration or decision of the case. The case was argued by Jack Greenberg for the petitioner and J.M. Breckenridge for the respondent, with additional support from other legal counsel for the petitioner.
Legal Issues Addressed
Participation of Justices in Supreme Court Decisionssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: Justice White did not participate in the consideration or decision of the case, demonstrating procedural norms in judicial participation.
Reasoning: Justice White did not participate in the consideration or decision of the case.
Precedential Authority in Judicial Decisionssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The Court relied on established precedents, namely Cole v. Arkansas and Williams v. Georgia, as the legal foundation for its decision to reverse the lower court's ruling.
Reasoning: The ruling referenced precedents, specifically Cole v. Arkansas and Williams v. Georgia, indicating a legal basis for the reversal.
Reversal of Lower Court Decisionssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The Supreme Court reversed the judgment of the Court of Appeals of Alabama, indicating a legal correction of the lower court's decision.
Reasoning: The Supreme Court of the United States issued a per curiam decision in the case of Fred L. Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, reversing the judgment of the Court of Appeals of Alabama.