Narrative Opinion Summary
The Supreme Court of the United States ruled in the case of Courtesy Sandwich Shop, Inc. v. Port of New York Authority, dismissing the appeal due to the absence of a substantial federal question. The decision was issued on November 12, 1963, with a rehearing denied on December 16, 1963. The appellants were represented by Edward S. Greenbaum and others, while the appellees included Sidney Goldstein and Daniel B. Goldberg. Additionally, state attorneys from New York and New Jersey participated on behalf of intervenor-appellees. The Court's per curiam ruling indicates that the case did not raise significant federal issues meriting further consideration.
Legal Issues Addressed
Dismissal of Appeal for Lack of Substantial Federal Questionsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal because the case did not present a significant federal issue that warranted the Court's review.
Reasoning: The Supreme Court of the United States ruled in the case of Courtesy Sandwich Shop, Inc. v. Port of New York Authority, dismissing the appeal due to the absence of a substantial federal question.
Per Curiam Decisionsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The Supreme Court issued a per curiam decision, indicating a unanimous and unsigned judgment, reflecting the Court's view that the case did not require significant examination.
Reasoning: The Court's per curiam ruling indicates that the case did not raise significant federal issues meriting further consideration.