Narrative Opinion Summary
The Supreme Court of the United States granted the petition for writ of certiorari in the case of Adolph Hohensee v. New Syndicate, Inc., vacating the previous judgment and remanding the case for reconsideration in light of the decision in Goldlawr, Inc. v. Heiman. Justices Harlan and Stewart dissented from the decision to grant certiorari, referencing their dissent in the Goldlawr case. Justice Frankfurter did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case. The case was decided on May 14, 1962, with rehearing denied on June 11, 1962.
Legal Issues Addressed
Dissenting Opinions in Certiorari Decisionssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: Justices Harlan and Stewart dissented from the decision to grant certiorari, indicating disagreement with the majority's decision.
Reasoning: Justices Harlan and Stewart dissented from the decision to grant certiorari, referencing their dissent in the Goldlawr case.
Grant of Certiorarisubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The Supreme Court granted certiorari to review the lower court's decision.
Reasoning: The Supreme Court of the United States granted the petition for writ of certiorari in the case of Adolph Hohensee v. New Syndicate, Inc.
Non-Participation of Justicessubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: Justice Frankfurter did not participate in the consideration or decision of the case.
Reasoning: Justice Frankfurter did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
Vacating and Remanding a Casesubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The judgment of the lower court was vacated and the case was remanded for reconsideration in light of a related decision.
Reasoning: vacating the previous judgment and remanding the case for reconsideration in light of the decision in Goldlawr, Inc. v. Heiman.