You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Smith Mountain Supply v. Windstar Prop.

Citations: 672 S.E.2d 845; 277 Va. 387; 2009 Va. LEXIS 24Docket: Record 080651.; Record 080652.

Court: Supreme Court of Virginia; February 27, 2009; Virginia; State Supreme Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

This case involves an appeal by Smith Mountain Building Supply, LLC, challenging the trial court's decision to invalidate its mechanic's liens against Windstar Properties, LLC. The central legal issue concerns the 150-day limitation for filing mechanic's liens under Code § 43-4. Smith Mountain had filed liens that included charges for materials supplied outside this statutory period. The trial court granted summary judgment for Windstar, ruling the liens invalid, as the charges violated the statutory time constraint. Smith Mountain argued that these charges were mere inaccuracies under Code § 43-15, referencing precedent cases Carolina Builders Corp. v. Cenit Equity Co. and Reliable Constructors, Inc. v. CFJ Properties, which it claimed supported its position of substantial compliance. However, the court rejected this argument, affirming the necessity for strict adherence to the statutory limitation. The court held that Code § 43-15 did not apply in this context, where charges violated statutory mandates. Consequently, the appellate court affirmed the trial court's decision, maintaining the invalidation of Smith Mountain's mechanic's liens, thereby ruling in favor of Windstar.

Legal Issues Addressed

Distinguishing Precedents in Mechanic's Lien Cases

Application: The court distinguished between the case at hand and Reliable Constructors, where the inclusion of a non-recoverable fine was deemed an inaccuracy rather than a statutory violation.

Reasoning: In Reliable Constructors, a subcontractor sought to enforce a lien that included a fine unrelated to labor or materials, but the court ruled it should have been allowed to show that including the fine was an inaccuracy rather than a violation of statutory prerequisites.

Inaccuracy under Code § 43-15

Application: The court ruled that Code § 43-15, which allows for inaccuracies in lien claims, does not apply when charges violate statutory prerequisites.

Reasoning: Smith Mountain contended that the inclusion of such sums was an 'inaccuracy' under Code § 43-15, which should not invalidate the liens, and sought to present evidence to support this claim, citing Reliable Constructors, Inc. v. CFJ Properties.

Mechanic's Liens and the 150-Day Limitation under Code § 43-4

Application: The court confirmed that mechanic's liens must strictly adhere to the 150-day limitation for supplying materials, as charges outside this period invalidate the lien.

Reasoning: The case involves Smith Mountain Building Supply, LLC (Smith Mountain) appealing a trial court decision that invalidated two mechanic's liens against Windstar Properties, LLC (Windstar) on the grounds that they included charges for materials supplied beyond the 150-day limitation set by Code § 43-4.

Strict Construction of Mechanic's Lien Statutes

Application: The court emphasized the necessity of strict construction of statutes governing mechanic's liens, reiterating that any charges beyond the statutory limitation period invalidate the lien.

Reasoning: The court emphasized the necessity of strict construction of statutes governing mechanic's liens and stated that Code § 43-15 was not applicable.