You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Henry v. Cherokee Construction & Supply Company, Inc.

Citations: 301 S.W.3d 263; 2009 Tenn. App. LEXIS 118; 2009 WL 792829Docket: E2008-01655-COA-R3-CV

Court: Court of Appeals of Tennessee; March 26, 2009; Tennessee; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

In this case, the Plaintiffs, Ron and Linda Henry, filed a lawsuit against Cherokee Construction and Supply Company, Inc., alleging negligent misrepresentation and construction defects after a wall in their home collapsed. The Defendant had filed a Notice of Completion in 1995, indicating the construction was complete, leading the Plaintiffs to make final payments despite unfinished work. The Defendant moved for summary judgment based on Tenn. Code Ann. § 28-3-201, which imposes a four-year statute of repose for construction-related claims. The Trial Court granted the motion, finding that the statute barred the Plaintiffs' suit. On appeal, the Plaintiffs argued that the statute was misapplied and that the wrongful concealment exception under Tenn. Code Ann. § 28-3-205 should toll the statute of limitations. However, the Court of Appeals upheld the summary judgment, ruling that the Plaintiffs' claims substantively related to construction defects and fell within the statute's scope. The appellate court also found no evidence of wrongful concealment by the Defendant, as required to invoke the exception. As a result, the summary judgment in favor of the Defendant was affirmed, with costs on appeal assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Legal Issues Addressed

Application of Tenn. Code Ann. § 28-3-202

Application: The court held that the Plaintiffs' claim, though framed as negligent misrepresentation, substantively related to construction deficiencies and was thus subject to the four-year statute of limitations for construction defects.

Reasoning: Plaintiffs contend that the Trial Court incorrectly applied Tenn. Code Ann. 28-3-202 by reclassifying their negligent misrepresentation claim as a construction defect case.

Statute of Repose under Tenn. Code Ann. § 28-3-201

Application: The court applied the four-year statute of repose to bar the Plaintiffs' claim regarding construction defects, as the claim was filed after the statutory period had elapsed.

Reasoning: The Trial Court granted, citing the four-year statute of repose under Tenn. Code Ann. § 28-3-201, barring the claim.

Summary Judgment Standards under Tennessee Rule of Civil Procedure 56

Application: Summary judgment was affirmed as there were no genuine issues of material fact, and the Defendant was entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Reasoning: According to Tennessee Rule of Civil Procedure 56, summary judgment is warranted when there are no genuine issues of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Wrongful Concealment Exception under Tenn. Code Ann. § 28-3-205

Application: The court determined that the wrongful concealment exception did not apply because Plaintiffs failed to provide evidence of concealment of the cause of action after it arose.

Reasoning: The court found no error in the Trial Court's ruling that the wrongful concealment exception does not apply and affirmed the summary judgment in favor of Defendant.