You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Two Rivers Baptist Church v. Jerry Sutton

Citation: Not availableDocket: M2008-01730-COA-R3-CV

Court: Court of Appeals of Tennessee; May 20, 2010; Tennessee; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

This case involves a dispute between members of a church and its officers regarding access to church records under Tennessee Code Annotated § 48-66-102. The members alleged governance failures and sought access to records to address their property rights within the organization. The trial court initially granted access to certain records but dismissed most claims against the church officers due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The appellate court affirmed that members have an unconditional right to access specific records under subsection (a) of the statute, which does not interfere with the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine. However, it reversed the trial court's decision regarding records under subsection (b), as the members failed to demonstrate a 'proper purpose' for access. The court further clarified that church members do not have property rights in the church's assets, consistent with the doctrine of non-profit corporation ownership. The appellate court's decision resulted in a partial affirmation and partial reversal of the trial court's ruling, with costs of the appeal shared between the parties.

Legal Issues Addressed

Conditional Access to Church Records

Application: Access to records under subsection (b) requires members to demonstrate a 'proper purpose' as per conditions in subsection (c), which the members failed to do in this case.

Reasoning: However, the court found that members did not demonstrate a 'proper purpose' to access records outlined in subsection (b), leading to a partial affirmation and partial reversal of the trial court's decision.

Ecclesiastical Abstention Doctrine

Application: The doctrine does not bar the production of non-doctrinal records under subsection (a) as it does not involve church doctrine or disputes.

Reasoning: The Church Officers contested the trial court's order to produce the records from subsection (a), claiming it violated the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine... However, the order was deemed consistent with the doctrine as it did not involve church doctrine or disputes.

Property Rights of Church Members

Application: Church members do not possess property rights in their contributions or church assets, aligning with the principle that a non-profit corporation owns its property, not its members.

Reasoning: Church members do not possess property rights in their contributions, meaning they have no rights to the church building or its assets. This aligns with the legal principle that a non-profit corporation owns its property, not its members.

Right to Access Church Records under Tennessee Code Annotated § 48-66-102

Application: Church members have an unconditional right to access specific records as outlined in subsection (a) of the statute, without conflicting with the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine.

Reasoning: The court determined that members have an unconditional right to records specified in subsection (a) of the statute, and this access does not conflict with the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine.