Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Vermont v. New Hampshire
Citation: 300 U.S. 636Docket: No. 2, original
Court: Supreme Court of the United States; February 15, 1937; Federal Supreme Court; Federal Appellate Court
The report by Commissioner Samuel S. Gannett, dated November 16, 1936, along with a supplemental report from January 14, 1937, regarding the boundary between Vermont and New Hampshire, has been presented to the court. Both states, through their counsel, have indicated that they have no exceptions or objections to these reports and requested the court to conclude the period for filing any objections. The court's decree includes the following points: 1. The deadline for filing exceptions or objections to the reports is terminated. 2. The reports are confirmed in all respects. 3. The boundary line as marked and located in the reports and accompanying maps is established as the official boundary between Vermont and New Hampshire, as previously determined by the court's decree of January 8, 1934. 4. The Commissioner is discharged from his duties after completing his work in alignment with the court's orders. 5. The Clerk of the Court is instructed to send authenticated copies of the decree, reports, and maps to the governors of Vermont and New Hampshire. 6. The costs associated with this action will be equally divided between Vermont and New Hampshire.