Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Immudyne, Inc. v. Kenneth E. Brailsford and Enrich Corporation D/b/a/ Enrich International
Citations: 56 F.3d 81; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19630; 1995 WL 298952Docket: 94-1526
Court: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; May 10, 1995; Federal Appellate Court
Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) prohibits the citation of opinions and orders designated as nonprecedential as legal precedent, but allows for the assertion of certain legal doctrines such as claim preclusion and judicial estoppel based on these decisions. In the case of Immudyne, Inc. (Plaintiff-Appellee) against Kenneth E. Brailsford and Enrich Corporation (Defendants-Appellants), the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the lower court's judgment. The case number is 94-1526, and the decision was rendered on May 10, 1995, by Circuit Judges Lourie, Schall, and Bryson. The ruling is succinctly noted as "Affirmed" under Fed. Cir. R. 36.